2025-03-07 - LD Düsseldorf - Tridonic v. CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics - UPC_CFI_459/2023
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_459/2023
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Proceeding Decision
- Parteien:
- Tridonic GmbH & Co KG v. CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd
Kernaussage: The Duesseldorf LD found the patent valid but not infringed, dismissing both infringement action and counterclaim for revocation.
2025-03-07 - LD Düsseldorf - Tridonic
v.
CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics - UPC_CFI_459/2023
notable
The Duesseldorf LD found the patent valid but not infringed, dismissing both infringement action and counterclaim for revocation. New validity attacks raised at oral hearing rejected — strategic tactical surprises are foreign to the RoP, whether under R. 263/265(2) or R. 9.2 RoP. Patent novel and inventive over D3, D4, D6. Feature 7.4 (decoupling element) not realized — capacitor C3 does not achieve complete signal separation.
Nichtigkeitsgründe
Art. 138 EPCNovelty
Patent survived (this ground)Art. 54 EPC · Art. 138(1)(a) EPC
“Novelty attacks over D3, D4, D6 all fail.”
Inventive Step
Patent survived (this ground)Art. 56 EPC · Art. 138(1)(a) EPC
“Prior art provides no motivation for claimed decoupling solution.”
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).