2024-10-18 - LD Munich - SES-imagotag v. Hanshow - UPC_CFI_292/2023
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_292/2023
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Application Order
- Parteien:
- SES-imagotag SA v. Hanshow Technology Co. Ltd, Hanshow Germany GmbH, Hanshow France SAS, Hanshow Netherlands B.V.
Kernaussage: The Munich Local Division dismissed the Hanshow defendants' application to have the missed one-month deadline for seeking assessment of their appeal costs (R.
2024-10-18 - LD Munich - SES-imagotag
v.
Hanshow - UPC_CFI_292/2023
notable
The Munich Local Division dismissed the Hanshow defendants' application to have the missed one-month deadline for seeking assessment of their appeal costs (R. 151 RoP) retroactively extended under R. 9.3(a) RoP, and with it dismissed the cost-assessment application itself as inadmissible. The Court held — in a published Leitsatz — that re-establishment of rights under R. 320 RoP is, within its scope, lex specialis and displaces the general deadline-extension mechanism in R. 9.3(a) RoP. A party that has lost a right (here: cost reimbursement) as the direct consequence of a missed deadline must invoke R. 320 RoP and pay the associated fee under R. 320.2 RoP in accordance with R. 371 RoP. The applicants had neither filed a re-establishment request at the competent CFI (only at the CoA), nor paid the fee — so even the misdirected re-establishment request was deemed not filed (R. 15.2 RoP), with no re-establishment available for that failure (R. 320.5 RoP).
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).