2025-06-10 - LD Hamburg - FAKRO v. Dolle - UPC_CFI_718/2024
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_718/2024
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- FAKRO Dachfenster GmbH, FAKRO Danmark A/S, FAKRO Sp.z.o.o, FAKRO Dachflächenfenster GmbH v. Dolle A/S
Kernaussage: The Hamburg Local Division ruled on the handling of a late application to amend the patent under R.
2025-06-10 - LD Hamburg - FAKRO
v.
Dolle - UPC_CFI_718/2024
notable
The Hamburg Local Division ruled on the handling of a late application to amend the patent under R. 30.2 RoP, filed by the patentee with its rejoinder to the revocation counterclaim. The judge-rapporteur confirmed that R. 30.2 RoP is a strict preclusion rule: a later application to amend is inadmissible until the Court has given leave, and no dismissing order is required for that state to obtain. She held that R. 30.2 RoP leaves the timing of the leave decision to the Court's discretion, exercised it by deferring the decision to the oral hearing, and gave the defendants an opportunity to comment in case leave is granted. The period for that comment is thirty days, not two months: the two-month period of R. 32.1 RoP is triggered by an application to amend under R. 30.1 RoP and not by a later application within the meaning of R. 30.2 RoP, which the wording of R. 32.1 RoP and point 7 of the Preamble to the Rules of Procedure — the one-year target for the oral hearing at first instance — both confirm.
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).