2025-08-05 - LD Hamburg - FAKRO et al. v. FAKRO et al. - UPC_CFI_461/2024

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_461/2024
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Dolle A/S v. FAKRO Dachflächenfenster GmbH, FAKRO Dachfenster GmbH, FAKRO Danmark A/S, FAKRO Sp.z.o.o

Kernaussage: The panel of the Hamburg Local Division decided under R.

2025-08-05 - LD Hamburg - FAKRO et al. v. FAKRO et al. - UPC_CFI_461/2024
🗂️Nur Fallakte
🏛️Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division• Order
📅2025-08-05
🔢UPC_CFI_461/2024
Parteien & Vertreter
UPC_CFI_461/2024
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Dolle A/S
Sönke SCHELTZ
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
FAKRO Dachflächenfenster GmbH
FAKRO Dachfenster GmbH
FAKRO Danmark A/S
FAKRO Sp.z.o.o
Julian WACHINGER
UPC_CFI_718/2024
Kläger / Berufungsführer
FAKRO Dachfenster GmbH
FAKRO Danmark A/S
FAKRO Sp.z.o.o
FAKRO Dachflächenfenster GmbH
Julian WACHINGER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Dolle A/S
Sönke SCHELTZ
⚖️Infringement
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

routine
The panel of the Hamburg Local Division decided under R. 37.1 RoP how it would proceed in respect of Art. 33(3) UPCA, and ordered that both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation, together with the two applications to amend the patent, be heard jointly before the Local Division. The Division declined the referral and stay options in Art. 33(3)(b) and (c) UPCA and retained the full dispute. Before making the order the Division heard the parties on its intended approach, and the parties consented to it. The order records no reasons beyond the parties' agreement, so it is an application of the default course in Art. 33(3)(a) UPCA rather than a reasoned choice between the three options.

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren