2024-01-02 - LD Munich - Amgen v. Sanofi et al. - UPC_CFI_14/2023

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_14/2023
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland, Sanofi -Aventis Groupe S.A., Sanofi Winthrop Industrie S.A., Regeneron pharmaceuticals Inc.

Kernaussage: The Munich Local Division (presiding judge and Judge-Rapporteur Zigann) granted the defendants' application to extend the deadline to comment on the JR's provisional dates for the interim conference (7 February 2024) and main oral hearing (4 June 2024) until 8 January 2024.

2024-01-02 - LD Munich - Amgen v. Sanofi et al. - UPC_CFI_14/2023
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Registereinträge

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Order
📅2024-01-02
🔢UPC_CFI_14/2023
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Amgen Inc.
Johannes HESELBERGER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Sanofi-Aventis Groupe S.A.
Sanofi Winthrop Industrie S.A.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Niels HOELDER
📋ORD_597730/2023
⚖️Infringement Action
🌐English

routine
The Munich Local Division (presiding judge and Judge-Rapporteur Zigann) granted the defendants' application to extend the deadline to comment on the JR's provisional dates for the interim conference (7 February 2024) and main oral hearing (4 June 2024) until 8 January 2024. The defendants had wrongly used the main workflow rather than the dedicated Rule 9 workflow required by Rule 4.1 RoP, which the JR cured by opening a fresh workflow. While the JR agreed with the claimant that 21 days even over the holiday season should normally suffice for hearing-date coordination, exercising the court's discretion the brief extension was appropriate because the overall handling of the case would not be materially affected. (Duplicate database ingestion of the same judgment recorded under node 581.)
Stichwörter
application for time extension by defendant

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren