2023-12-04 - LD Munich - Panasonic v. Xiaomi et al. - UPC_CFI_213/2023 UPC_CFI_220/2023 UPC_CFI_224/2023

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_213/2023 UPC_CFI_220/2023 UPC_CFI_224/2023
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Final Order
Parteien:
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v. Xiaomi Inc. et al.

Kernaussage: Festsetzung des Zustelldatums

2023-12-04 - LD Munich - Panasonic v. Xiaomi et al. - UPC_CFI_213/2023 UPC_CFI_220/2023 UPC_CFI_224/2023
🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Final Order
📅2023-12-04
🔢UPC_CFI_213/2023 UPC_CFI_220/2023 UPC_CFI_224/2023
Parteien & Vertreter
UPC_CFI_213/2023
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
Miriam KIEFER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Xiaomi Inc.
Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co. Ltd.
Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH
Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S.
Xiaomi Technology Italy S.R.L.
Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.
Xiaomi H.K. Limited
Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.
Odiporo GmbH
Shamrock Mobile GmbH
Oliver BÄCKER
UPC_CFI_220/2023
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
Sören DAHM
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Xiaomi Inc.
Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co. Ltd.
Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH
Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S
Xiaomi Technology Italy S.R.L
Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.
Xiaomi H.K. Limited
Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.
Odiporo GmbH
Shamrock Mobile GmbH
Henrik LEHMENT
UPC_CFI_224/2023
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
Christof AUGENSTEIN
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Xiaomi Inc.
Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co. Ltd.
Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH
Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S.
Xiaomi Technology Italy S.R.L.
Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.
Xiaomi H.K. Limited
Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.
Odiporo GmbH
Shamrock Mobile GmbH
Benjamin SCHRÖER
📋ORD_589352/2023
⚖️Infringement Action
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

Festsetzung des Zustelldatums

routine
The Munich LD (Zigann) implemented a negotiated compromise in three parallel Panasonic v Xiaomi infringement actions over EP 2 197 132, EP 3 024 163 and EP 2 584 854. The parties had disagreed about whether service on the four foreign Xiaomi entities (1, 2, 7, 8) via the German affiliate was effective; Panasonic had applied under R. 275.2 RoP to deem service done. In exchange for a uniform extension of the Klageerwiderung deadline for all ten defendants to 31 January 2024, the defendants' counsel accepted service on the foreign entities. The court confirmed the compromise: acceptance of service, the uniform extension, consolidation of all preliminary objections across all defendants (including the 3 November 2023 direction that the objections will be dealt with in the main hearing), and recording 19 September 2023 as the service date for defendant 5 in ACT_545562/2023.
Stichwörter
275.2 RoP

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren