2023-11-27 - LD Munich - Panasonic v. Xiaomi et al. - UPC_CFI_213/2023 UPC_CFI_220/2023 UPC_CFI_224/2023
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_213/2023 UPC_CFI_220/2023 UPC_CFI_224/2023
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- Panasonic Holdings Corporation v. Xiaomi Inc. et al.
Kernaussage: Festsetzung des Zustelldatums
2023-11-27 - LD Munich - Panasonic
v.
Xiaomi et al. - UPC_CFI_213/2023 UPC_CFI_220/2023 UPC_CFI_224/2023
Festsetzung des Zustelldatums
routine
In three consolidated Panasonic v Xiaomi infringement actions, the Munich LD (presiding judge Zigann) issued a preliminary case-management order addressing Panasonic's R. 275.2 RoP application to confirm service on defendants 1, 2, 7 and 8 (served at the German defendant 3's address) and the local defendants' application for a uniform Statement of Defence deadline to 31 January 2024. Rather than decide the contested service question, which would generate further appellate delay or risk default judgments, the court proposed a package compromise mirroring defendants' own offer: defendants' counsel accepts service for 1, 2, 7 and 8 under R. 275.2 RoP, and in exchange the court would set a uniform extension of the Statement of Defence deadline for all defendants to 31 January 2024. The court noted the defendants belong to a large global group capable of responding swiftly and that Mannheim LD had granted the parallel defendants only until 21 December 2023 — the 31 January 2024 extension is therefore generous.
Stichwörter
275.2 RoP
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).