2023-11-28 - LD Hamburg - Avago Technologies v. Tesla - UPC_CFI_54/2023

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_54/2023
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limitet v. Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE/Tesla Germany GmbH

Kernaussage: The Hamburg LD (judge-rapporteur Dr.

2023-11-28 - LD Hamburg - Avago Technologies v. Tesla - UPC_CFI_54/2023
🏛️Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division• Order
📅2023-11-28
🔢UPC_CFI_54/2023
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited
Florian Oliver Gunther SCHMIDT-BOGATZKY
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Tesla Germany GmbH
Marcus GROSCH
📋ORD_589355/2023
⚖️Infringement Action
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

notable
The Hamburg LD (judge-rapporteur Dr. Schilling) held that the two-month period for the Reply to the Statement of Defence under R. 29(a) RoP begins to run only when the R. 262A RoP confidentiality procedure concerning that Statement of Defence is complete — not at formal service — because only then can counsel discuss the pleading with the client or the approved confidentiality-club members. The court characterised this as a declaratory finding of deadline calculation under R. 9.3(a) RoP rather than an extension, as the effective ability to exercise the right to be heard determines the start-point. The separate application to align the Rejoinder-to-counterclaim deadline with the Reply deadline under R. 29(a) RoP was deferred so the defendants could be heard under R. 264 RoP, because that request would involve an actual extension.

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren