2023-08-17 - LD Munich - Amgen v. Sanofi et al. - UPC_CFI_14/2023

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_14/2023
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Amgen, Inc.

Kernaussage: Munich LD (Judge Zigann) issued a case-management order in the Amgen v Sanofi/Regeneron infringement action addressing the procedural chaos created when the parties filed overlapping deadline applications in multiple — partly already-closed — CMS workflows.

2023-08-17 - LD Munich - Amgen v. Sanofi et al. - UPC_CFI_14/2023
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Registereinträge

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

  • UPC_CFI_14/2023 (Sie lesen diesen hier) Text zuerst hier gespeichert
  • UPC_CFI_14/2023
🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Order
📅2023-08-17
🔢UPC_CFI_14/2023
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Amgen Inc.
Johannes HESELBERGER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Sanofi-Aventis Groupe S.A.
Sanofi Winthrop Industrie S.A.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Niels HOELDER
📋ORD_562104/2023
⚖️Generic Order
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

routine
Munich LD (Judge Zigann) issued a case-management order in the Amgen v Sanofi/Regeneron infringement action addressing the procedural chaos created when the parties filed overlapping deadline applications in multiple — partly already-closed — CMS workflows. The Court held, as a Leitsatz, that different applications must be filed and processed in separate workflows for clarity's sake. Exceptionally, applications already filed in the 'wrong' workflows need not be re-filed; instead the Court opens a dedicated workflow for the topics of deadline calculation, extension and shortening. Parties were invited to make submissions on the substantive deadline dispute by 22.08.2023; the claimant's further suggestion to jointly hear the infringement and the parallel revocation action before the Central Division was treated as a non-binding suggestion to be considered after the Central Division's Rule 19 RoP ruling.

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren