2026-10-29 - LD Brussels - Establishment Labs v. GC Aesthetics et al. - UPC-CFI-0000629/2026

Aktenzeichen:
UPC-CFI-0000629/2026
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Establishment Labs S.A. v. GC Aesthetics ParentCo Limited, Nagor Limited, GC Aesthetics Management Limited, GC Aesthetics (Distribution) Limited, GC Aesthetics (France) SAS, EuroSilicone SAS, GC Aesthetics Italy S.R.L., GC Aesthetics GmbH, GC Aesthetics Spain, S.L.U., Global Consolidated Aesthetics (UK) Limited, GC Aesthetics Holdings Limited, GC Aesthetics Finance Limited, Romed NV

Kernaussage: The Judge-Rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division treated a party's request to reissue the interim-conference order of 28 October 2026 as a request under R.

2026-10-29 - LD Brussels - Establishment Labs v. GC Aesthetics et al. - UPC-CFI-0000629/2026
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Aktenzeichen

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

🏛️Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division• Order
📅2026-10-29
🔢UPC-CFI-0000629/2026
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Establishment Labs S.A.
Joanna DEAS
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
GC Aesthetics ParentCo Limited
Nagor Limited
GC Aesthetics Management Limited
GC Aesthetics (Distribution) Limited
GC Aesthetics (France) SAS
EuroSilicone SAS
GC Aesthetics Italy S.R.L.
GC Aesthetics GmbH
GC Aesthetics Spain, S.L.U.
Global Consolidated Aesthetics (UK) Limited
GC Aesthetics Holdings Limited
GC Aesthetics Finance Limited
Romed NV
Ute PFALLER
Ernst-Ulrich WITTMANN
Gregory BACON
⚖️Counterclaim for revocation
🌐English

routine
The Judge-Rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division treated a party's request to reissue the interim-conference order of 28 October 2026 as a request under R. 353 RoP and rectified one paragraph of it. The passage had attributed to the Defendants submissions that the patentee had in fact made, and had recorded the patentee as maintaining a 'no-confidentiality' argument instead of its confidentiality argument on the prior-disclosure issue. After hearing the patentee, who agreed, the Judge-Rapporteur ordered the paragraph to read with the corrected attribution and wording. The order changes only the record of the interim conference and decides nothing on the merits.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren