2025-07-02 - LD Munich - Swarco Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme et al. v. Yunex - UPC_CFI_245/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_245/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Application Order
Parteien:
Shenzhen Dianming Technology Co., Ltd (Swarco Futurit v. Yunex)

Kernaussage: The Claimaints application against the intervener for security for costs is rejected (see UPC_CoA_393/2025 APL_20694/2025 - AorticLab v.

2025-07-02 - LD Munich - Swarco Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme et al. v. Yunex - UPC_CFI_245/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Application Order
📅2025-07-02
🔢UPC_CFI_245/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme Ges.m.b.H.
Shenzhen Dianming Technology Co., Ltd
Alexander KOLLER
Martin HERZOG
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Yunex GmbH
Hosea HAAG
📋ORD_28635/2025
⚖️Generic application
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

The Claimaints application against the intervener for security for costs is rejected (see UPC_CoA_393/2025 APL_20694/2025 - AorticLab v. Emboline).

The Munich Local Division rejected a Plaintiff's application for a security for costs against an intervener on the Defendant's side. The Court agreed that the intervener is to be treated as a party but according to the CoA, a security for costs cannot be ordered against a defending party in an infringement action.
Stichwörter
Intervener

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren