2025-06-03 - LD Munich - Swarco Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme et al. v. Yunex - UPC_CFI_245/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_245/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Shenzhen Dianming Technology (Swarco Futurit v. Yunex)

Kernaussage: 1.

2025-06-03 - LD Munich - Swarco Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme et al. v. Yunex - UPC_CFI_245/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Order
📅2025-06-03
🔢UPC_CFI_245/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme Ges.m.b.H.
Shenzhen Dianming Technology Co., Ltd
Alexander KOLLER
Martin HERZOG
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Yunex GmbH
Hosea HAAG
📋ORD_24108/2025
⚖️Application Rop313
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

1. The application for intervention by Shenzhen Dianming Technology Co., Ltd dated 16 May 2025 is granted. Shenzhen Dianming will be treated as a party. 2. The request for intervention dated 24 April 2025 is therefore dismissed. The application is rejected. 3. Shenzhen Dianming may comment on the application for legal costs within 10 days. 4. Shenzhen Dianming may submit a statement in support of the application for leave to intervene within 10 days.

The Munich Local Division allowed a third party's application to intervene (Rule 313) on the side of the Defendants - the original parties did not object - and ordered that the intervening party should be treated as a party in all related proceedings. It further gave the third party the opportunity to comment on an application regarding a security for legal fees. Since the party had intervened on their own, an application for an invitation to intervene (Rule 316) was dismissed.
Stichwörter
Application for legal costs

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren