2025-06-17 - CoA - Knaus Tabbert v. Yellow Sphere Innovations et al. - UPC_CoA_365/2025; UPC_CoA_413/2025
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CoA_365/2025; UPC_CoA_413/2025
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)
- Art:
- Application Order
- Parteien:
- Knaus Tabbert AG v. Yellow Sphere Innovations
Kernaussage: An objection to the rejection of an application for suspensive effect pursuant to R.
2025-06-17 - CoA - Knaus Tabbert
v.
Yellow Sphere Innovations et al. - UPC_CoA_365/2025; UPC_CoA_413/2025
An objection to the rejection of an application for suspensive effect pursuant to R. 223 RoP, in which the applicant merely challenges the Court of Appeal´s opinion expressed in the order rejecting the application, is inadmissible.
The Court of Appeal rejected an objection to the rejection of an application for suspensive effect (Rule 223) as inadmissible. The CoA further stated that even if admissible, the objection would have been unsuccessful because the underlying facts of the application could already have been submitted in first instance and would therefore have been disregarded in the application for suspensive effect.
Stichwörter
Objection (“Gegenvorstellung”) against a Court of Appeal´s rejection of an Application for suspensive effect (R. 223 RoP)
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).