2024-07-25 - LD Hamburg - Daedalus Prime v. Xiaomi et al. - UPC_CFI_169/2024

1. The fact that coordination with suppliers based outside Europe, whose components are at the heart of the infringement allegation, is necessary, regularily does not constitute a convincing reason for an exceptional extension of a time limit. 2. Restrictive confidentiality obligations, which are imposed on a defendant, do typically not justify an extension as the RoP do provide especially for that purpose a possibility for the protection of confidential information in R. 262A RoP.

Application was rejected