2024-10-11 - LD Hamburg - Daedalus Prime v. Xiaomi et al. - UPC_CFI_169/2024

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_169/2024
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Daedalus Prime LLC v. Xiaomi

Kernaussage: 1.

2024-10-11 - LD Hamburg - Daedalus Prime v. Xiaomi et al. - UPC_CFI_169/2024
🏛️Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division• Order
📅2024-10-11
🔢UPC_CFI_169/2024
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Daedalus Prime LLC
Marc GRUNWALD
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.
Xiaomi Inc.
Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.
Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH
MediaTek Inc. (Headquarters)
Tilman MUELLER-STOY
📋ORD_51859/2024
⚖️Application Rop 333
🌐English

1. When it comes to the number and individuality of persons authorised to have access the number generally should not be larger than necessary to comply with the right of the parties to an effective remedy and a fair trial. 2. The interest of formulating a universal strategy for international disputes, also regarding forums outside of the UPC Member States and even outside of the EU, might be advantageous for a Claimant. But this interest cannot be seen as essential for litigating the present case and therefore does not outweigh the Defendants’ interest in confidentiality.

In this panel review, the Hamburg Local Division confirmed the judge-rapporteur's procedural order regarding confidentiality.
Stichwörter
Confidentiality R. 262A RoP, Art. 58 UPCA

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren