2024-08-30 - LD Munich - Avago Technologies v. Tesla - UPC_CFI_52/2023
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_52/2023
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Proceeding Decision
- Parteien:
- Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited v. Tesla Germany GmbH
Kernaussage: Munich Local Division (full panel, Zigann presiding) revoked EP 1 838 002 for the German territory in Avago's infringement action against Tesla's in-cabin radar (Tesla Model Y, AWR6843 chip).
2024-08-30 - LD Munich - Avago Technologies
v.
Tesla - UPC_CFI_52/2023
notable
Munich Local Division (full panel, Zigann presiding) revoked EP 1 838 002 for the German territory in Avago's infringement action against Tesla's in-cabin radar (Tesla Model Y, AWR6843 chip). Applying the claim-construction framework set by the CoA in UPC_CoA_335/2023 (NanoString/10x Genomics) — Art. 69 EPC plus the Protocol — the panel construed claim 1 to require that 'normalized complex signal', 'offset information' and 'transmit property information' all be cumulatively produced as the result of converting the outbound data, with the offset/transmit-property information necessarily standing in direct relation to the normalisation step. So construed, claim 1 was anticipated by D3 (WO 2007/010091 A1, Murtojärvi) under Art. 54(3) EPC: D3's multimode transmitter (Figs 3, 6, 8, 10) discloses a programmable hybrid transmitter operable in both first and second modes with the same architecture (Cartesian-to-Polar-to-Cartesian conversion blocks) and produces an FM I/Q signal whose phase information serves as offset information and whose AM information controls the power-amplifier gain as transmit-property information. Auxiliary requests under Rule 30 RoP were rejected as merely clarifying the original construction without further limitation; admissibility/timeliness of the auxiliary requests therefore did not need to be decided. Method claim 7 fell with claim 1; dependent claims defended only via the independence of claims 1 and 7 also fell. The infringement claim was dismissed as moot; standing (Aktivlegitimation) likewise did not need to be addressed.
Nichtigkeitsgründe
Art. 138 EPCNovelty
Patent invalid (this ground)Art. 54 EPC · Art. 138(1)(a) EPC
“Munich LD held EP 1 838 002 anticipated under Art. 54(3) EPC by WO 2007/010091 A1 (Murtojärvi, D3) — a multimode transmitter with switchable Cartesian-to-Polar-to-Cartesian conversion blocks producing an FM I/Q signal whose phase information serves as offset information and whose AM information serves as transmit-property information. Independent claim 7 falls with claim 1; dependent claims fall with the independent claims.”
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).