2026-05-19 - LD Munich - Philips v. Belkin et al. - UPC_CFI_5/2023

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_5/2023
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Decision
Parteien:
Philips IP Ventures B.V. v. REDACTED PARTY, Belkin GmbH, Belkin International, Inc, Belkin Limited, REDACTED PARTY

Kernaussage: The Munich Local Division permitted the withdrawal of an infringement action and of the revocation counterclaim under Rule 265.

2026-05-19 - LD Munich - Philips v. Belkin et al. - UPC_CFI_5/2023
🗂️Nur Fallakte
🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Decision
📅2026-05-19
🔢UPC_CFI_5/2023
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
Tilman MUELLER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Name not displayed for GDPR reasons. Represented by Philipp CEPL
Belkin GmbH
Belkin International, Inc
Belkin Limited
Name not displayed for GDPR reasons. Represented by Constanze KRENZ
Constanze KRENZ
⚖️Infringement
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

notable
The Munich Local Division permitted the withdrawal of an infringement action and of the revocation counterclaim under Rule 265.1 RoP, each side having consented, and declared both proceedings closed. It fixed the value in dispute separately for each proceeding and allocated the court fees to the party that had started it, each side bearing its own costs. It refused both applications for reimbursement of court fees: Rule 370.9(b) RoP reimburses only a withdrawal made before the close of the written procedure, and the written procedure in both proceedings had closed in 2024. The Court set out, but did not need to rely on, the transitional rule that the version of Rule 370.9(b) RoP in force when the withdrawal application is filed governs the rate — here the amended text with its 50% rate, the applications having been filed after 31 December 2025.

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren