2024-05-03 - LD Munich - Panasonic v. OPPO et al. - UPC_CFI_208/2023
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_208/2023
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- Panasonic Holdings Corporation , Panasonic Holdings Corporation v. OROPE Germany GmbH, Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.
Kernaussage: In the Panasonic v OPPO 4G-SEP infringement action, the rapporteur at the Munich Local Division partly granted cross-applications for production of licence agreements relevant to the FRAND defence.
2024-05-03 - LD Munich - Panasonic
v.
OPPO et al. - UPC_CFI_208/2023
notable
In the Panasonic v OPPO 4G-SEP infringement action, the rapporteur at the Munich Local Division partly granted cross-applications for production of licence agreements relevant to the FRAND defence. The court held that under R. 104(e) RoP a rapporteur may order production even before the relevance of a FRAND defence is conclusively established, and that the possibility of confidentiality measures means secrecy needs do not preclude production. Panasonic must produce its 4G-SEP licence agreements (and third-party agreements in its control concerning its 4G-SEPs) covering mobile devices; 3G agreements, future agreements, Panasonic's asset disposals of 4G-SEPs, and unspecified chipset-maker agreements were held not currently producible. Corresponding confidentiality applications are handled in the separate R. 262/262A workflow, referencing LD Mannheim's parallel order in UPC_CFI_210/2023 of 14 February 2024; English-language exhibits are exempt from translation; reply deadline extended to 17 May 2024.
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).