2024-02-22 - LD Mannheim - Panasonic v. OPPO et al. - UPC_CFI_210/2023

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_210/2023
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v. OROPE Germany GmbH, Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.

Kernaussage: The Mannheim LD exercised its discretion under Art.

2024-02-22 - LD Mannheim - Panasonic v. OPPO et al. - UPC_CFI_210/2023
🏛️Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division• Order
📅2024-02-22
🔢UPC_CFI_210/2023
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
Christopher WEBER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.
OROPE Germany GmbH
Boukje VAN DER MAAZEN
📋ORD_7452/2024
⚖️Generic Order
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

routine
The Mannheim LD exercised its discretion under Art. 33(3)(a) UPCA to hear the infringement action together with the counterclaim for revocation and the FRAND counterclaim in joint proceedings. The court preferred joint hearing over bifurcation for efficiency and to ensure uniform claim construction by the same panel. The court further held that an early decision on the Art. 33(3) UPCA question prior to the close of the written procedure is permissible under R. 37.2 RoP provided the parties were heard, justified here by the court's nascent operational stage. The rapporteur was directed to request assignment of a technically qualified judge.

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren