2025-01-20 - LD Paris - N.J DIFFUSION v. GISELA MAYER - UPC_CFI_363/2024
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_363/2024
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division
- Art:
- Application Order
- Parteien:
- N.J DIFFUSION v. Gisela Mayer GmbH
Kernaussage: 1) The Court considers that the evidence admissible before the UPC is non-exhaustively listed in Rule 170 RoP.
2025-01-20 - LD Paris - N.J DIFFUSION
v.
GISELA MAYER - UPC_CFI_363/2024
1) The Court considers that the evidence admissible before the UPC is non-exhaustively listed in Rule 170 RoP.
2) The fact that Rule 201 RoP on experiments was not expressly mentioned in the applicant's request does not lead to the inadmissibility of the request.
3) The requested measure consists of mere observations and not experiments within the meaning of Rule 201 RoP.
In this order (only available in French), the Paris Local dismissed a request for an in-person case management conference, ruling that the requested measures were unnecessary since enlarged photographs were already provided in the written submissions.
Stichwörter
Legal basis of the procedural request and admissibility , Experiments according to R. 201 RoP, freedom of choice in accordance with R. 170 RoP,
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (French).