2026-10-26 - CoA - Fives ECL v. Reel - UPC-COA-0000042/2026
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC-COA-0000042/2026
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- Fives ECL v. REEL GmbH
Kernaussage: In an appeal against a Hamburg Local Division decision, the Court of Appeal judge-rapporteur granted the respondent's R.
2026-10-26 - CoA - Fives ECL
v.
Reel - UPC-COA-0000042/2026
routine
In an appeal against a Hamburg Local Division decision, the Court of Appeal judge-rapporteur granted the respondent's R. 262A RoP request to restrict access to confidential information in its Statement of response and exhibits to the appellant's representatives and named individuals from the appellant's group. The order sets out the Art. 58 UPCA and R. 262A.1 RoP framework and the R. 262A.6 RoP limit on the number of persons with access, assessed by the person's role, the relevance of the information to that role and the person's trustworthiness (Daedalus v Xiaomi; SharkNinja v SEB). The appellant raised no objection after being heard under R. 262A.4 RoP. The order binds the persons with access to non-use and non-disclosure beyond the proceedings and allows a periodic penalty payment for culpable breach, with the amount left to the circumstances of the breach rather than the EUR 250,000 per-violation cap the applicant had proposed.