2026-08-27 - LD Düsseldorf - Aesculap v. Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument et al. - UPC_CFI_307/2025

Was ist diese UPC-Entscheidung?

Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division confirmed a settlement reached after the oral hearing but before judgment in an infringement action, on the joint application of the claimant and two of the three defendants. Under R. 365.1 sentence 2 RoP the Court confirms a settlement on the parties' application, and such a decision is enforceable as a final decision of the Court. The costs decision followed the parties' own agreement, each bearing its own costs with no reimbursement between them. The Court ordered under R. 365.2 RoP that the details of the settlement be treated as confidential and that only the redacted version of the settlement agreement enter the register, and it deferred the claimant's additional application under R. 262.2 RoP until an application to inspect under R. 262.1(b) RoP is actually made, following the Court of Appeal in Tandem Diabetes v Roche and Arkyne v Plant-e. The proceedings were declared ended between the settling parties and continue against the remaining defendant.

Quelle und Fundstellen

Quelle: UPC Website

Aktenzeichen: UPC_CFI_307/2025