2026-08-13 - LD Düsseldorf - Sia Lightguide et al. v. Biolitec - UPC_CFI_256/2025
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_256/2025
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- S.I.A. LIGHTGUIDE International, Light Guide Optics Germany GmbH v. biolitec Holding GmbH & Co. KG
Kernaussage: The Düsseldorf Local Division, Panel 2, sitting through its presiding judge as judge-rapporteur, classified passages of a cost-determination application and the response to it as confidential under Art.
2026-08-13 - LD Düsseldorf - Sia Lightguide et al.
v.
Biolitec - UPC_CFI_256/2025
routine
The Düsseldorf Local Division, Panel 2, sitting through its presiding judge as judge-rapporteur, classified passages of a cost-determination application and the response to it as confidential under Art. 58 UPCA and R. 262.2 RoP. Both parties had applied for the classification. The reasoning is short and turns on one criterion: information about the time spent on legal work and the hourly rates charged is accessible only to a restricted circle of persons, so a legitimate interest in its protection exists. The Court aligned itself with two earlier Düsseldorf orders on R. 262.2 and R. 262A RoP, one in Ortovox v Mammut of 22 April 2025 and one in Grundfos v Hefei Xinhu Canned Motor Pump of 7 August 2026. The order settles nothing in the underlying cost determination; it fixes only which passages of the two pleadings and of annex CBH 55 are shielded.
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).