2026-07-02 - LD Düsseldorf - Otec Pr Zisionsfinish v. ANCA Europe - UPC-CFI-0001536/2026
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC-CFI-0001536/2026
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- OTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH v. ANCA Europe GmbH a. o.
Kernaussage: In preservation-of-evidence proceedings, the Düsseldorf Local Division ordered the release of the court-appointed expert's unredacted detailed description to the applicant after the inspected respondent, given the opportunity to assert confidentiality interests, raised none.
2026-07-02 - LD Düsseldorf - Otec Pr Zisionsfinish
v.
ANCA Europe - UPC-CFI-0001536/2026
routine
In preservation-of-evidence proceedings, the Düsseldorf Local Division ordered the release of the court-appointed expert's unredacted detailed description to the applicant after the inspected respondent, given the opportunity to assert confidentiality interests, raised none. The Court held that where the party affected by an inspection and preservation of evidence asserts no confidentiality interest in the information contained in the expert's detailed description, the unredacted version must be disclosed to the applicant and its representatives, following the Court of Appeal in Progress Maschinen und Automation v AWM. It lifted the confidentiality-protection order in the earlier saisie orders vis-à-vis the applicant, but confirmed under R. 196(2)/199(2) RoP that the results of the inspection may be used only in main proceedings against the respondent. It also fixed the period to bring the main action (the longer of 31 calendar days or 20 working days after disclosure, running from entry of the order into the CMS) under Art. 60(8) UPCA and R. 198(1)/199(2) RoP.
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).