2025-10-17 - LD Brussels - Genentech et al. v. Organon et al. - UPC_CFI_407/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_407/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Genentech, Inc. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. Organon & Co Organon Heist B.V. N.V. Organon Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc.

Kernaussage: The President of the Brussels Local Division, in review proceedings concerning an order to preserve evidence and an order for inspection, allowed two named persons on the applicants' side to attend the oral hearing of 21 October 2025 by videoconference under R.

2025-10-17 - LD Brussels - Genentech et al. v. Organon et al. - UPC_CFI_407/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division• Order
📅2025-10-17
🔢UPC_CFI_407/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
UPC_CFI_407/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Genentech, Inc.
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
Rutger KLEEMANS
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Organon & Co
Organon Heist B.V.
N.V. Organon
Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc.
Judith KRENS
UPC_CFI_408/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Genentech, Inc.
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
Rutger KLEEMANS
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Organon & Co
Organon Heist B.V.
N.V. Organon
Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc.
Judith KRENS
⚖️Generic Order
🌐English

routine
The President of the Brussels Local Division, in review proceedings concerning an order to preserve evidence and an order for inspection, allowed two named persons on the applicants' side to attend the oral hearing of 21 October 2025 by videoconference under R. 112(3)(a) RoP. The permission is conditional: remote access is graduated to the level of confidentiality access the named persons may claim, and the connection may be paused while pleadings accessible only to the applicants' representative are discussed. The Court reserved to the hearing itself the question whether the two persons count as representatives of the applicants; if they do not, their remote attendance is confined to the parts of the hearing that carry no confidentiality restriction. The order determines no substantive question in either case.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren