2026-05-19 - LD The Hague - BMS Innovations v. BYD - UPC-CFI-0002228/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC-CFI-0002228/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
BMS Innovations, LLC v. BYD Company Ltd et al

Kernaussage: The Hague LD partly upheld a R.

2026-05-19 - LD The Hague - BMS Innovations v. BYD - UPC-CFI-0002228/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division• Order
📅2026-05-19
🔢UPC-CFI-0002228/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
BMS Innovations, LLC
Christian DEKONINCK
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
BYD Company Ltd
BYD Auto Co., Ltd.,
BYD Europe B.V.
BYD France SAS
BYD Automotive GmbH
BYD Mobility GmbH
BYD Sweden AB
BYD (U.K.) Co., Ltd.
BYD POLSKA SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ
Hendrik LAMBERS
Eveline LOTS
Rien BROEKSTRA
⚖️Infringement Action
🌐English

notable
The Hague LD partly upheld a R. 19/20 RoP preliminary objection on international jurisdiction in an infringement action concerning EP 3 393 001. The Court held that it has no jurisdiction over the UK-domiciled defendant BYD UK because the only asserted infringing acts occur in the United Kingdom — outside both UPCA and EU territory — and Art. 8(1) Brussels I bis, read with Art. 71b(2), cannot be invoked to create jurisdiction where there is no connection at all to the addressed court. By contrast, the long-arm objection of the Chinese co-defendants BYD Company and BYD Auto concerning their alleged UK acts is deferred to the main proceedings, as the pending CJEU referral in Dyson v Dreame (UPC_CoA_813/2025) may be dispositive. BYD's own request to refer questions on Art. 8(1) and 71b(2) BR was refused because the underlying condition was not met.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren