2026-02-25 - LD Düsseldorf - Ottobock v. BrainPortfolio et al. - UPC-CFI-0001927/2025
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC-CFI-0001927/2025
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- Ottobock SE & Co. KGaA v. BrainPortfolio Inc
Kernaussage: ENGLISH:
2026-02-25 - LD Düsseldorf - Ottobock
v.
BrainPortfolio et al. - UPC-CFI-0001927/2025
ENGLISH:
If a defendant has used its own website to create the impression that there has been no patent infringement, it may be justified under Art. 80 UPCA to not only allow the claimant to publish the Court’s decision, but also to require the defendant to publish the operative part of the decision on its website.
routine
The Düsseldorf LD issued a procedural scheduling order for Ottobock's application for provisional measures against BrainPortfolio (prosthetics/orthopedics). The order sets non-extendable deadlines for written submissions, schedules oral hearing, and requests the CFI President to assign an additional technically qualified judge with expertise in classification A61F/A61B (prosthetics/medical devices) pursuant to Art. 18(3) UPCA.
Stichwörter
ENGLISH:
R. 209.1 (b) VerfO
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).