2026-01-08 - LD Milan - Danieli et al. v. Primetals Technologies Austria et al. - UPC_CFI_377/2025; UPC_CFI_702/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_377/2025; UPC_CFI_702/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Primetals Technologies Austria GmbH v.  Danieli & C. S.p.A.

Kernaussage: Evidence production request under Art.

2026-01-08 - LD Milan - Danieli et al. v. Primetals Technologies Austria et al. - UPC_CFI_377/2025; UPC_CFI_702/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division• Order
📅2026-01-08
🔢UPC_CFI_377/2025; UPC_CFI_702/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
UPC_CFI_377/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Primetals Technologies Austria GmbH
Konstantin SCHALLMOSER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Danieli & C. S.P.A.
Giulio Enrico SIRONI
UPC_CFI_702/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Danieli & C. S.P.A.
Giulio Enrico SIRONI
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Primetals Technologies Austria GmbH
Konstantin SCHALLMOSER
📋N/A
⚖️Infringement Action
🌐English

notable
Evidence production request under Art. 59 UPCA / R. 190 RoP rejected as inadmissible and unfounded. Primetals sought disclosure about a Danieli plant in Vietnam but had failed to raise this in earlier evidence preservation proceedings. Negligence cannot be remedied by a R. 190 request duplicating an earlier application. Public photographs + employee analyses fell below the evidence threshold.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren