2025-12-10 - LD Düsseldorf - Topsoe v. Technische Universität München et al. - UPC-CFI-0001849/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC-CFI-0001849/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Topsoe A/S v. SYPOX GmbH a.o.

Kernaussage: The Düsseldorf LD granted an ex-parte R.

2025-12-10 - LD Düsseldorf - Topsoe v. Technische Universität München et al. - UPC-CFI-0001849/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division• Order
📅2025-12-10
🔢UPC-CFI-0001849/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Topsoe A/S
Christine KANZ
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Technische Universität München
SYPOX GmbH
Josef Kerner Energiewirtschafts-GmbH
HyGear B.V
Christian Markowsky
Matthias HÜLSEWIG
Ricardo DIJKSTRA
📋N/A
⚖️Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

routine
The Düsseldorf LD granted an ex-parte R. 192/199 inspection and evidence preservation order for a hydrogen production plant (Topsoe v SYPOX, EP 3 802 413). The applicant demonstrated plausible infringement of claims 1 (device) and 22 (process) based on LinkedIn posts, industry articles, the respondent's own patent application (WO 2021/209509), and a brief site visit. The order allows expert inspection of the plant including opening the reactor to examine the catalyst bed, accessing control systems, and exporting process data. Urgency established because the plant was not yet in commercial operation and evidence access would be lost once it starts. Validity assessment not required absent clear indications of invalidity. Confidentiality regime established with the expert report restricted to main proceedings.

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren