2025-06-06 - LD Mannheim - Ceracon et al. v. Sunstar et al. - UPC_CFI_745/2024; UPC_CFI_200/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_745/2024; UPC_CFI_200/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division
Art:
Application Order
Parteien:
Sunstar Engineering v. CeraCon

Kernaussage: On a regular basis, no leave to amend a counterclaim for revocation if the new prior art document could easily have been found

2025-06-06 - LD Mannheim - Ceracon et al. v. Sunstar et al. - UPC_CFI_745/2024; UPC_CFI_200/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division• Application Order
📅2025-06-06
🔢UPC_CFI_745/2024; UPC_CFI_200/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
UPC_CFI_200/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
CeraCon GmbH
Matthias SONNTAG
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Sunstar Engineering Europe GmbH
Sunstar Engineering Inc.
Holger STRATMANN
UPC_CFI_745/2024
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Sunstar Engineering Europe GmbH
Holger STRATMANN
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
CeraCon GmbH
Matthias SONNTAG
📋ORD_22156/2025
⚖️Amend Document
🌐English

On a regular basis, no leave to amend a counterclaim for revocation if the new prior art document could easily have been found

The Mannheim Local Division - represented by the Judge-Rapporteur - denied the application to amend a counterclaim for revocation, stating that the Counterclaimant could have easily found the document in question and included it in the original counterclaim. The Court found that the Patentee's interests outweighed the Counterclaimant's interests.
Stichwörter
counterclaim for revocation, R. 263 RoP

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren