2025-05-21 - LD Düsseldorf - Siemens Healthcare et al. v. Siemens Healthcare et al. - UPC_CFI_758/2024; UPC_CFI_259/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_758/2024; UPC_CFI_259/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
Art:
Application Order
Parteien:
Hologic v. Siemens Healthcare, Siemens Healthineers

Kernaussage: The burden of showing that the enforcement of a cost order is unduly burdensome is on the applicant of an order for security for costs.

2025-05-21 - LD Düsseldorf - Siemens Healthcare et al. v. Siemens Healthcare et al. - UPC_CFI_758/2024; UPC_CFI_259/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division• Application Order
📅2025-05-21
🔢UPC_CFI_758/2024; UPC_CFI_259/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
UPC_CFI_259/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Siemens Healthcare SAS
Siemens Healthcare GmbH
Siemens Healthineers AG
Siemens Healthineers Nederland B.V.
Matthias MEYER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Hologic, Inc.
Thure SCHUBERT
UPC_CFI_758/2024
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Hologic, Inc.
Thure SCHUBERT
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Siemens Healthineers AG
Siemens Healthcare GmbH
Siemens Healthineers Nederland B.V.
Siemens Healthcare SAS
Matthias MEYER
📋ORD_17624/2025
⚖️Generic application
🌐English

The burden of showing that the enforcement of a cost order is unduly burdensome is on the applicant of an order for security for costs. To this end, the applicant in its application shall not only provide evidence as to the foreign law applicable in the territory where the order shall be enforced, but also its application.

The Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed an application for a security for legal costs, stating that the Applicants did not provide evidence regarding the application of foreign law.
Stichwörter
Security for costs

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren