2024-09-17 - CD Paris - Suinno v. Microsoft - UPC_CFI_164/2024

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_164/2024
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Microsoft v. Suinno Mobile

Kernaussage: For the purposes of applying Rule 361 ‘RoP’, the condition of manifest inadmissibility implies that the inadmissibility must be clearly evident from the pleadings and its assessment does not require any particular in-depth analysis.

2024-09-17 - CD Paris - Suinno v. Microsoft - UPC_CFI_164/2024
🏛️Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat• Order
📅2024-09-17
🔢UPC_CFI_164/2024
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy
Petri ESKOLA
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Microsoft Corporation
Tilman MUELLER-STOY
📋ORD_43015/2024
⚖️Application Rop 333
🌐English

For the purposes of applying Rule 361 ‘RoP’, the condition of manifest inadmissibility implies that the inadmissibility must be clearly evident from the pleadings and its assessment does not require any particular in-depth analysis.

The Court rejected the application for review, confirming the previous order by the judge rapporteur which rejected the application to dismiss the action based on Rule 361 ("manifest inadmissibility").

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren