2026-09-16 - LD Mannheim - Inteo v. Discovery Communications et al. - UPC-CFI-0002730/2026
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC-CFI-0002730/2026
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Decision
- Parteien:
- Inteo v. Nokia Technologies Oy, Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc., Dplay Entertainment Limited, Discovery Communications Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Discovery Communications, LLC, HBO Nordic AB, HBO Europe s.r.o., Discovery Communications Benelux B.V., WarnerMedia Global Digital Services, LLC, Home Box Office, Inc.
Kernaussage: The Mannheim LD judge-rapporteur rejected a law firm's request, made for training purposes, for access to the pleadings and orders of an infringement action that had ended by withdrawal.
2026-09-16 - LD Mannheim - Inteo
v.
Discovery Communications et al. - UPC-CFI-0002730/2026
notable
The Mannheim LD judge-rapporteur rejected a law firm's request, made for training purposes, for access to the pleadings and orders of an infringement action that had ended by withdrawal. The request was inadmissible because a request under R. 262.1(b) RoP must in principle be made in the language of the proceedings to whose file access is sought, here German, and the applicant had filed in English despite a notice from the Court. Orders of the Court are not a proper subject of a request under R. 262.1(b) RoP, which covers written pleadings and evidence, and there is no need for one because orders are published in the register. The registry does not search the file for the applicant: where pleadings are not listed, access is given first only to the main pleadings without exhibits.
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).