2026-09-28 - LD Munich - The Scripps Research Institute et al. v. BioNTech et al. - UPC-CFI-0002819/2026

Aktenzeichen:
UPC-CFI-0002819/2026
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Decision
Parteien:
The Scripps Research Institute, Promosome LLC v. BioNTech SE, BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH, BioNTech Manufacturing Marburg GmbH, BioNTech Innovative Manufacturing Services GmbH, BioNTech Europe GmbH, Pfizer Manufacturing Belgium NV, Pfizer SAS, Pfizer AB, Pfizer, Inc.

Kernaussage: After the Munich LD revoked the patent and dismissed the infringement action, the judge-rapporteur granted the cost applications of both defendant groups in line with the flat fee of EUR 750,000 per group that the parties had agreed and the merits decision had recorded.

2026-09-28 - LD Munich - The Scripps Research Institute et al. v. BioNTech et al. - UPC-CFI-0002819/2026
🗂️Nur Fallakte
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Aktenzeichen

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Decision
📅2026-09-28
🔢UPC-CFI-0002819/2026
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
The Scripps Research Institute
Promosome LLC
Georg RAUH
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
BioNTech SE
BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH
BioNTech Manufacturing Marburg GmbH
BioNTech Innovative Manufacturing Services GmbH
BioNTech Europe GmbH
Pfizer Manufacturing Belgium NV
Pfizer SAS
Pfizer AB
Pfizer, Inc.
Tobias J. HESSEL
Christine KANZ
⚖️Other
🌐English

routine
After the Munich LD revoked the patent and dismissed the infringement action, the judge-rapporteur granted the cost applications of both defendant groups in line with the flat fee of EUR 750,000 per group that the parties had agreed and the merits decision had recorded. With the parties' agreement, the award is settled by releasing the EUR 1.5 million security for costs and transferring it directly to the defendants, applying R. 352.2 RoP by analogy to the release of a security for costs as the Court of Appeal did in Ballinno/Kinexon and Oerlikon/Bhagat. The cost proceedings close on completion of the transfer, and no decision on the costs of the cost proceedings was needed, consistent with Hanshow/VusionGroup.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren