2025-05-28 - CD Paris - Aylo Premium v. DISH - UPC_CFI_198/2024

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_198/2024
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat
Art:
Proceeding Decision
Parteien:
AYLO PREMIUM LTD v. DISH Technologies L.L.C.

Kernaussage: The Paris Central Division revoked the German part of EP 3 822 805 B1 (adaptive-rate video streaming) for added matter under Art.

2025-05-28 - CD Paris - Aylo Premium v. DISH - UPC_CFI_198/2024
🗂️Nur Fallakte
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Registereinträge

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

  • UPC_CFI_198/2024 Text zuerst hier gespeichert
  • UPC_CFI_198/2024 (Sie lesen diesen hier)
🏛️Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat• Proceeding Decision
📅2025-05-28
🔢UPC_CFI_198/2024
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
AYLO PREMIUM LTD
Georg ANETSBERGER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
DISH Technologies L.L.C.
Denise BENZ
⚖️Revocation
🌐English

notable
The Paris Central Division revoked the German part of EP 3 822 805 B1 (adaptive-rate video streaming) for added matter under Art. 138(1)(c)/123(2) EPC. The court held that the claim's reference to 'the highest quality' copy introduced an inadmissible generalization, as the parent application only disclosed upshifting to 'the next higher quality stream.' The court established that the UPC can limit revocation to specific national parts of a European bundle patent at the claimant's request, rejecting academic commentary requiring legally compelling reasons for territorial limitation. The court denied a stay pending EPO opposition proceedings and rejected all 16 auxiliary requests.

Nichtigkeitsgründe

Art. 138 EPC
1 Grund
Added Matter
Art. 123(2) EPC · Art. 138(1)(c) EPC
Patent invalid (this ground)
“Feature 1.7 reference to 'the highest quality' extended beyond parent application which only disclosed 'the next higher quality stream.' [9.27]”
Feststellungen aus Sicht des Patentinhabers bezeichnet. Quelle: KI-Klassifikation (AI)

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren