2026-01-20 - LD Munich - Syngenta v. Sumi Agro - UPC_CFI_326/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_326/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Decision
Parteien:
Syngenta Limited v. Sumi Agro Limited, Sumi Agro Europe Limited

Kernaussage: Panel 1 of the Munich Local Division closed a whole dispute in a single decision after the parties settled: the infringement action, the counterclaim for revocation and a separate application for a cost decision left over from earlier provisional-measures proceedings were all wi…

2026-01-20 - LD Munich - Syngenta v. Sumi Agro - UPC_CFI_326/2025
🗂️Nur Fallakte
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Aktenzeichen

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

  • UPC_CFI_326/2025 (Sie lesen diesen hier) Text zuerst hier gespeichert
  • UPC_CFI_566/2024
🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Decision
📅2026-01-20
🔢UPC_CFI_326/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
UPC_CFI_326/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Syngenta Limited
Jörn Peters
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Sumi Agro Limited
Sumi Agro Europe Limited
Gareth WILLIAMS
UPC_CFI_566/2024
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Syngenta Limited
Benjamin GRZIMEK
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Sumi Agro Limited
Sumi Agro Europe Limited
Gareth WILLIAMS
⚖️Generic
🌐English

routine
Panel 1 of the Munich Local Division closed a whole dispute in a single decision after the parties settled: the infringement action, the counterclaim for revocation and a separate application for a cost decision left over from earlier provisional-measures proceedings were all withdrawn, the proceedings declared closed and the decision entered on the register. No cost decision was required, as each side asked. Because the written procedures had not yet closed, the Court directed the Registry to refund 60% of the court fees to the claimant and 60% to the defendants. The decision is reasoned in two sentences and cites no provision at all, neither R. 265 RoP for the withdrawals nor the reimbursement rule; the 60% rate is only available under R. 370.9(b) RoP in its version in force before 1 January 2026. A pending application for a cost decision is treated like any other action for these purposes and can simply be withdrawn. The published heading names the cost proceeding as UPC_CFI_326/2024, while the subject-matter line and the operative part both give UPC_CFI_326/2025.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren