2026-05-11 - CoA - FAKRO v. Dolle - UPC-COA-0000929/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC-COA-0000929/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)
Art:
Decision
Parteien:
FAKRO Dachflächenfenster GmbH, FAKRO Dachfenster GmbH, FAKRO Danmark A/S, FAKRO Sp.z.o.o v. Dolle A/S

Kernaussage: The Court of Appeal permitted the withdrawal of an infringement action and of a revocation counterclaim while the appeals against the Hamburg Local Division's decision were pending, each side consenting to the other's withdrawal, and declared both appeal proceedings closed.

2026-05-11 - CoA - FAKRO v. Dolle - UPC-COA-0000929/2025
🗂️Nur Fallakte
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Aktenzeichen

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

🏛️Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)• Decision
📅2026-05-11
🔢UPC-COA-0000929/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
UPC-COA-0000928/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
FAKRO Dachflächenfenster GmbH
FAKRO Dachfenster GmbH
FAKRO Danmark A/S
FAKRO Sp.z.o.o
Julian WACHINGER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Dolle A/S
Sönke SCHELTZ
UPC-COA-0000929/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
FAKRO Dachflächenfenster GmbH
FAKRO Dachfenster GmbH
FAKRO Danmark A/S
FAKRO Sp.z.o.o
Julian WACHINGER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Dolle A/S
Sönke SCHELTZ
⚖️Appeal
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

notable
The Court of Appeal permitted the withdrawal of an infringement action and of a revocation counterclaim while the appeals against the Hamburg Local Division's decision were pending, each side consenting to the other's withdrawal, and declared both appeal proceedings closed. It issued no cost decision: Rule 265.2(c) RoP directs one, but the parties had agreed that each bears its own out-of-court costs, so none was needed. It ordered reimbursement of 50% of the appeal court fees on each appeal, applying the new version of Rule 370.9(b) RoP by analogy because the action and the counterclaim were withdrawn before the close of the written procedure. The decision confirms both that a first-instance claim can be withdrawn at the appeal stage and that the fee-reimbursement regime reaches appeal fees.

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren