2024-05-15 - LD The Hague - Plant-e Knowledge v. Arkyne Technologies - UPC_CFI_239/2023

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_239/2023
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division
Art:
Application Order
Parteien:
Plant-e v. Arkyne Technologies

Kernaussage: closure of CMS only

2024-05-15 - LD The Hague - Plant-e Knowledge v. Arkyne Technologies - UPC_CFI_239/2023
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Registereinträge

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

  • UPC_CFI_239/2023 Text zuerst hier gespeichert
  • UPC_CFI_239/2023 (Sie lesen diesen hier)
🏛️Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division• Application Order
📅2024-05-15
🔢UPC_CFI_239/2023
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Plant-e Knowledge B.V.
Plant-e B.V.
Oscar LAMME
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Arkyne Technologies S.L.
Bernd ALLEKOTTE
📋ORD_15876/2024
⚖️Application RoP262A
🌐English

closure of CMS only

notable
The Hague Local Division, acting through its judge-rapporteur, granted defendant Bioo's R. 262A RoP application to protect experimental research data filed with its rejoinder in a Plant-e infringement action, but expanded the requested confidentiality club. The Court held that information protected by a third-party NDA and not shared with the public or competitors can readily be treated as confidential under Art. 58 UPCA and R. 262A.1 RoP, rejecting Plant-e's argument that the public sale of the relevant devices (Bioo Panels) renders test results conducted on them public as well. On the composition of the confidentiality club, the Court applied R. 262A.6 RoP's proportionality standard: where the redacted information is crucial to the defendant's non-infringement case, access must be broad enough to allow the claimant a fair trial, including its full legal team, its party expert and more than one natural person with distinct technical expertise. Use of the information was restricted to the main infringement action (not the counterclaim), and a per-breach penalty of up to EUR 100,000 was ordered under Art. 82(4) UPCA and R. 354(3) RoP.
Stichwörter
CMS

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren