2025-04-03 - LD Munich - Promosome v. BioNTech et al. - UPC_CFI_846/2024

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_846/2024
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
BioNTech, Pfizer v. Promosome LLC

Kernaussage: Application to produce evidence under Rule 190 RoP rejected.

2025-04-03 - LD Munich - Promosome v. BioNTech et al. - UPC_CFI_846/2024
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Registereinträge

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

  • UPC_CFI_846/2024 (Sie lesen diesen hier) Text zuerst hier gespeichert
  • UPC_CFI_846/2024
🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Order
📅2025-04-03
🔢UPC_CFI_846/2024
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Promosome LLC
Georg RAUH
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
BioNTech SE
BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH
BioNTech Manufacturing Marburg GmbH
BioNTech Innovative Manufacturing Services GmbH
BioNTech Europe GmbH
Pfizer Manufacturing Belgium NV
Pfizer SAS
Pfizer AB
Pfizer, Inc.
Tobias J. HESSEL
Christine KANZ
📋ORD_11610/2025
⚖️Procedural Order
🌐English

Application to produce evidence under Rule 190 RoP rejected.

The Munich Local Division rejected an application for the production of evidence by Defendants in infringement proceedings. The Defendants requested that the Claimant produce specific data regarding an expert report. The Court rejected the application as "inadmissible or at least unfounded", stating that the Defendants had not substantiated that the evidence was indeed required for their non-infringement argument which, at this stage, was not even presented. This order was published twice identically as it applied to two parallel applications by the different Defendant groups.
Stichwörter
Rule 190 RoP, production of evidence, evidence

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren