2025-04-01 - LD Mannheim - Total Semiconductor v. Texas Instruments - UPC_CFI_132/2024
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_132/2024
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Application Order
- Parteien:
- TOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR v. Texas Instruments
Kernaussage: R.
2025-04-01 - LD Mannheim - Total Semiconductor
v.
Texas Instruments - UPC_CFI_132/2024
R. 12.5, 36 RoP include as an formal aspect that the party requesting to allow further briefs sets out in the application itself sufficient details, which justify the request. This requires that the applicant does not limit its submission to vague and general terms alone but sets out in detail with reference to specific paragraphs of the briefs which points had been addressed so far and explains with a sufficient level of substantiation the grounds why a further brief is necessary in deviation from the general framework of R. 12 RoP.
The Mannheim Local Division rejected an application for the exchange of further written submissions, stating that the application was not sufficiently substantiated. Instead of vague statements regarding incomplete or incorrect facts raised by the defendants in their rejoinder, the applicant should have given concrete references to allow the judge-rapporteur to check the submissions with which he was not already familiar.
Stichwörter
additional brief