2025-08-27 - LD Mannheim - Huawei v. HMD Global - UPC_CFI_481/2025
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_481/2025
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. v. HMD Global Oy
Kernaussage: The judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division confirmed that the decision on the defendant's application for allocation of a technically qualified judge under R.
2025-08-27 - LD Mannheim - Huawei
v.
HMD Global - UPC_CFI_481/2025
notable
The judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division confirmed that the decision on the defendant's application for allocation of a technically qualified judge under R. 33.1 RoP is deferred until after the statement of defence is received. The deferral serves procedural economy: where a counterclaim for revocation is filed, local divisions regularly decide under Art. 33(3)(a) UPCA to hear and decide it themselves, and a technically qualified judge must then be added in any event, so a separate allocation under Art. 8(5) UPCA and R. 33.1 RoP becomes unnecessary. The Division recorded its standing practice of taking the Art. 33(3) UPCA decision already on receipt of the counterclaim under R. 37.2 RoP, rather than after the close of the written procedure. Until the statement of defence arrives there is no need for a technically qualified judge to have engaged with the subject matter, and scheduling the oral hearing does not require an earlier decision either.
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (English).