2024-06-03 - LD Hamburg - Ballinno v. Kinexon Sports Media et al. - UPC_CFI_151/2024
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_151/2024
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Proceeding Decision
- Parteien:
- Ballinno B.V. vs UEFA, Kinexon
Kernaussage: 1.
2024-06-03 - LD Hamburg - Ballinno
v.
Kinexon Sports Media et al. - UPC_CFI_151/2024
1. As soon as a patent proprietor has knowledge of the alleged infringement, it must investigate it, take the necessary measures to clarify it and obtain the documents required to support its claims. A longer period (here almost three months) without significant efforts to clarify the possible patent infringement has to be considered as not treating the matter with the necessary urgency.
2. On the technologies used in the “Video Assistant Referee” (VAR) decision making process in a game of football.
Dismissal of application for provisional measures because infringement not sufficiently proven
Stichwörter
Urgency; preliminary injunction; Art. 62(2) UPCA; Rule 209(2)(b) RoP; Rule 211(3) RoP. Degree of certainty; Art. 62 (4) UPCA; Rule 211.2 RoP