2024-06-19 - LD The Hague - Abbott v. Sibio Technology - UPC_CFI_130/2024

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_130/2024
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division
Art:
Proceeding Decision
Parteien:
Sibio Technology Limited, Umedwings Netherlands B.V. v. Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.

Kernaussage: Application for provisional measures (R.

2024-06-19 - LD The Hague - Abbott v. Sibio Technology - UPC_CFI_130/2024
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Registereinträge

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

  • UPC_CFI_130/2024 Text zuerst hier gespeichert
  • UPC_CFI_130/2024 (Sie lesen diesen hier)
🏛️Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division• Proceeding Decision
📅2024-06-19
🔢UPC_CFI_130/2024
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.
Wim MAAS
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Sibio Technology Limited
Thomas GNIADEK
📋ORD_30434/2024
⚖️Application for provisional measures
🌐English

Application for provisional measures (R. 206 RoP). Order granted in part (R. 211 RoP). Sufficient interest in this case despite unilateral cease-and-desist declaration (yes). Application is not devoid of purpose (R. 360 RoP). Competence for Ireland not contested.

notable
The Hague Local Division granted Abbott a preliminary injunction against Sibio and its EU importer Umedwings for infringement of EP 2 713 879 covering continuous glucose monitoring devices, in Germany, France, the Netherlands and Ireland. The defendants did not challenge validity, infringement or urgency but argued that a unilateral cease-and-desist declaration rendered the application devoid of purpose under R. 360 RoP. The court held that a unilateral undertaking does not by itself remove the applicant's legitimate interest where the undertaking lacks an irrevocable penalty and the defendant has in fact continued sales after the declaration. Competence over Ireland — a UPCA signatory that has not yet ratified — was confirmed on the basis of Art. 31 UPCA read with the Brussels I Recast (Regulation 1215/2012), with the Local Division finding itself territorially competent under Art. 33 UPCA because (threatened) infringement occurred in the Netherlands.
Stichwörter
provisional measures, competence, legitimate interest, cease-and-desist declaration

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren