2025-04-03 - LD Mannheim - Corning v. TCL et al. - UPC_CFI_819/2024

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_819/2024
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division
Art:
Application Decision
Parteien:
Corning v. Hisense, TCL, LG Electronics

Kernaussage: The Mannheim Local Division rejected the Defendants' preliminary objection that was mainly based on an alleged violation of the principle of fair trial because the Claimant had sued three different competitors in one complaint while suing the OEM / supplier in different proceedi…

2025-04-03 - LD Mannheim - Corning v. TCL et al. - UPC_CFI_819/2024
🏛️Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division• Application Decision
📅2025-04-03
🔢UPC_CFI_819/2024
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Corning Incorporated
Marcus GROSCH
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Hisense Gorenje Germany GmbH
Hisense Europe Holding GmbH
TCL Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG
TCL Deutschland Verwaltungs GmbH
TCL Operations Polska, Sp. z o.o.
TCL Belgium, SA
LG Electronics Deutschland GmbH
LG Electronics European Shared Service Center B.V.
LG Electronics European Holding B.V.
Felix ROEDIGER
Eva ACKER
📋ORD_10672/2025
⚖️Preliminary objection
🌐English

The Mannheim Local Division rejected the Defendants' preliminary objection that was mainly based on an alleged violation of the principle of fair trial because the Claimant had sued three different competitors in one complaint while suing the OEM / supplier in different proceedings. The Court found itself competent and rejected the Defendants' argument, stating that the competitors could have been sued individually or as a group. This order was followed by another order issued on 9 April 2025 where the Court rejected the application to separate the proceedings.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren