2024-05-08 - LD Munich - Huawei v. Netgear - UPC_CFI_9/2023

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_9/2023
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Application Order
Parteien:
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd

Kernaussage: Application for an order for the production of evidence against the applicant.

2024-05-08 - LD Munich - Huawei v. Netgear - UPC_CFI_9/2023
🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Application Order
📅2024-05-08
🔢UPC_CFI_9/2023
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd
Tobias J. HESSEL
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Netgear Inc.
NETGEAR Deutschland GmbH
Netgear International Limited
Henning GUTHEIL
📋ORD_22952/2024
⚖️Generic application
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

Application for an order for the production of evidence against the applicant.

notable
In this Wi-Fi 6 SEP action, the claimant (Huawei) itself sought an order under Rules 9 and 172.2 RoP directing it to produce an unredacted copy of a recently concluded licence agreement with Amazon, together with confidentiality protection under Rule 262A RoP, so that the licence could be introduced in aid of its FRAND defence rebuttal. The Munich Local Division (Judge Zigann as Judge-Rapporteur) confirmed the preliminary order of 25 April 2024 granting production and confidentiality, expressly adopting the Mannheim Local Division's reasoning (UPC_CFI_218/2023, App_14035/2024 of 30/04/2024) that production orders directed against the applying party itself are permissible under Rule 103 RoP. The Court further permitted use of the licence in the parallel proceeding concerning EP 3 678 321 (UPC_CFI_168/2024). Because the relief was essentially uncontested, no further reasoning was needed.
Stichwörter
Rule 262A RoP, Rule 262A RoP, Rule 172.2 RoP, Rule 103 RoP, order, against the applicant

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren