2024-03-13 - LD Munich - Steindl Krantechnik Gesellschaft v. BEHA Bau- und Forstgreiftechnik, Inh. Georg Beha e.K. - UPC_CFI_354/2023
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_354/2023
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Proceeding Decision
- Parteien:
- Steindl Krantechnik Gesellschaft m.b.H. v. BEHA Bau- und Forstgreiftechnik, Inh. Georg Beha e.K.
Kernaussage: Feststellung eines Vergleichs gem.
2024-03-13 - LD Munich - Steindl Krantechnik Gesellschaft
v.
BEHA Bau- und Forstgreiftechnik, Inh. Georg Beha e.K. - UPC_CFI_354/2023
Feststellung eines Vergleichs gem. Regel 365.1 VerfO.
notable
The Munich Local Division confirmed a settlement reached between Steindl Krantechnik and BEHA Bau- und Forstgreiftechnik in a provisional-measures proceeding over EP 3 287 315. The parties had reached a preliminary agreement during the oral hearing on 30 January 2024 and filed the signed settlement text on 5 March 2024 under R. 365 RoP. The panel confirmed the settlement by 'decision' (not 'order') as R. 365.1 RoP requires, ordered the details of the settlement and cost arrangement to be treated as confidential under R. 365.2 RoP, and noted that no separate cost decision was necessary because costs were conclusively regulated in clause 4 of the settlement. The decision is to be entered in the register subject to the confidentiality carve-out.
Stichwörter
Vergleich; Regel 365.1 VerfO
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).