2025-02-28 - CD Paris - NJOY v. Juul Labs - UPC_CFI_312/2023

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_312/2023
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat
Art:
Order
Parteien:
NJOY Netherlands B.V. v  Juul Labs International Inc.

Kernaussage: The Paris Local Division upheld a patent in amended form and decided that both parties had to bear their own costs.

2025-02-28 - CD Paris - NJOY v. Juul Labs - UPC_CFI_312/2023
🏛️Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat• Order
📅2025-02-28
🔢UPC_CFI_312/2023
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
NJOY Netherlands B.V.
Henrik HOLZAPFEL
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Juul Labs, Inc.
Bernhard THUM
📋ORD_10060/2025
⚖️Revocation Action
🌐English

The Paris Local Division upheld a patent in amended form and decided that both parties had to bear their own costs.
Stichwörter
revocation, claim interpretation, clarity, added matter, admission of auxiliary claims

Nichtigkeitsgründe

Art. 138 EPC
3 Gründe
Novelty
Art. 54 EPC · Art. 138(1)(a) EPC
Patent survived (this ground)
“AR1 novel over Chen and Cohen. Notch-defined channel air inlet and integral channel features distinguish. [9.17]-[9.37]”
Inventive Step
Art. 56 EPC · Art. 138(1)(a) EPC
Patent survived (this ground)
“AR1 involves inventive step. No convincing argument for obviousness of notch/channel features. [9.38]-[9.41]”
Added Matter
Art. 123(2) EPC · Art. 138(1)(c) EPC
Patent invalid (this ground)
“Granted claim 1 extends beyond grandparent application. Feature 1.4.7 not directly and unambiguously derivable — paragraph [00170] intrinsically linked to Fig. 14. [8.1]-[8.16]”
Feststellungen aus Sicht des Patentinhabers bezeichnet. Quelle: KI-Klassifikation (AI)

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren