2025-02-12 - LD Munich - Biolitec v. Light Guide Optics et al. - UPC_CFI_714/2024

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_714/2024
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Application Decision
Parteien:
biolitec v. LIGHTGUIDE International, Light Guide Optics

Kernaussage: The Munich Local Division rejected a preliminary objection against an infringement action which was based on the argument that the action should have been brought before the LD Düsseldorf where the claimant had applied for provisional measures.

2025-02-12 - LD Munich - Biolitec v. Light Guide Optics et al. - UPC_CFI_714/2024
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Registereinträge

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

  • UPC_CFI_714/2024 (Sie lesen diesen hier) Text zuerst hier gespeichert
  • UPC_CFI_714/2024
🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Application Decision
📅2025-02-12
🔢UPC_CFI_714/2024
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
biolitec Holding GmbH & Co. KG
Paul SZYNKA
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Light Guide Optics Germany GmbH
S.I.A. LIGHTGUIDE International
Jörg SCHMIDT
📋ORD_68717/2024
⚖️Preliminary objection
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

The Munich Local Division rejected a preliminary objection against an infringement action which was based on the argument that the action should have been brought before the LD Düsseldorf where the claimant had applied for provisional measures. The LD Munich found itself competent and argued that Article 33(2) UPCA would not apply since the Düsseldorf action was already in second instance and therefore not "pending" before another CFI's division.

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren