2025-01-24 - LD Milan - Dainese v. Alpinestars - UPC_CFI_472/2024

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_472/2024
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division
Art:
Application Order
Parteien:
Dainese v. Alpinestars

Kernaussage: Rule, 262 A.

2025-01-24 - LD Milan - Dainese v. Alpinestars - UPC_CFI_472/2024
🏛️Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division• Application Order
📅2025-01-24
🔢UPC_CFI_472/2024
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Dainese S.p.A.
Federico CARUSO
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Alpinestars S.p.A.
Massimiliano TIBERIO
📋ORD_68844/2024
⚖️Application RoP262A
🌐English

Rule, 262 A.6 .RoP (“The number of persons referred to in paragraph 1 shall be no greater than necessary in order to ensure compliance with the right of the parties to the legal proceedings to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, and shall include, at least, one natural person from each party and the respective lawyers or other representatives of those parties to the legal proceedings) which is designed to protect the principle of the adversarial process, may be derogated: A) with parties' consent; B) in the event of interference of the patent system with the antitrust system: the Community system expressly allows that access is not granted to natural persons but only to their advisers (see EUROPEAN COMMISSION COMMUNICATION ‘Communication on the protection of confidential information by national courts in proceedings concerning the private enforcement of EU competition law’ (2020/C 242/01, para. 61

In this heavily redacted procedural order of the Milan Local Division, the court granted an application for confidentiality under RoP.262A.
Stichwörter
rule 262 A ROP

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren