2025-01-21 - Court of - Edwards Lifesciences v. Meril et al. - UPC_CFI_380/2023
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_380/2023
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Nordic Baltic Regional Division
- Art:
- Application Order
- Parteien:
- KIPA AB (Edwards v. Meril)
Kernaussage: There is no legal basis for ordering a member of the public, who has made a request for access to written pleadings and evidence, to reimburse legal costs incurred by the parties to the relevant proceedings when they are consulted by the judge-rapporteur in accordance with Rule …
2025-01-21 - Court of - Edwards Lifesciences
v.
Meril et al. - UPC_CFI_380/2023
There is no legal basis for ordering a member of the public, who has made a request for access to written pleadings and evidence, to reimburse legal costs incurred by the parties to the relevant proceedings when they are consulted by the judge-rapporteur in accordance with Rule 262.1(b) RoP. Article 69 UPCA does not apply in this situation. Therefore, such requests for reimbursement of costs shall be dismissed.
The Court granted leave to appeal.
The Nordic-Baltic Regional Division dismissed an application for cost reimbursement in proceedings on an application for accessing court files. The Court stated that there was no legal basis for a reimbursement of legal costs and that Article 69 UPCA did not apply.
Stichwörter
Article 69 UPCA, Rule 265 RoP, access to pleadings and evidence, Rule 262.1(b) RoP, legal costs, withdrawal,